RE: SVN merging documentation branches

Subject: RE: SVN merging documentation branches
From: Andrew Warren <awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com>
To: Karen Felker <akaren -at- earthlink -dot- net>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 01:19:24 +0000

Karen Felker wrote:

> Our DITA documentation is under SVN control.
> ....
> Some engineers have suggested we branch our documentation
> ....
> When we tried something like this about two years ago, the SVN merge
> did not catch all the changes made inside <ph> element tags.
> ....
> Does anyone have experience with similar branching and merging of
> DITA-based docs? If so, have you run into any problems like this?


=== Andrew Warren - awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com
=== Synaptics, Inc - Santa Clara, CA

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

SVN merging documentation branches: From: Karen Felker

Previous by Author: Re: verb for "gaining followers on Facebook" ?
Next by Author: RE: "comprises" alternatives - "consists of" vs. "includes"
Previous by Thread: SVN merging documentation branches
Next by Thread: Adobe Support [was: Resolved! was: Adobe is at it again...]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads