Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...

Subject: Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:33:38 -0700

I'd password-protect the PDF, add a watermark, and add a first page
explaining things.

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net> wrote:
> Hello, TechWR-L-ers,
> I’m working on my electronic portfolio. I’ve received permission from clients to post excerpts from docs that are labeled “Proprietary and Confidential”. So, what’s the correct way to show these:
> * As is, with an explanation on the page where you click to view the doc that I’ve received permission to post this.
> * Go back to my source files and remove the “Proprietary and Confidential” designation, and I guess change the Doc Last Revised date so that it’s clear that this is not actually the doc as it was initially distributed.
> * Some sort of Acrobat header addition where I put in an explanation that the doc is now “declassified”. Not sure if that’s the right word for something that wasn’t actually “classified” in a national security classification sense...

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp

Previous by Author: RE: Client/Server vs. Server/Client
Next by Author: Re: DITA versus HAT
Previous by Thread: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...
Next by Thread: Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads