TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Dilbert Today From:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:"Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)" <Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com> Date:Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:54:14 -0700
The comments I usually get from engineers is something along the lines of,
"you repeated what I told you, but you managed to do it using half as many
words." I've worked with engineers who could have done as good a job of
writing their documents as I could, but just not as fast as I could. And
I've NEVER worked with any engineers who actually WANTED to write their own
documents. My experience with the SMEs I have worked with has been that
when they told me it would have been easier for them to write a document
themselves than to work with the last writer they had, most of the time it
turned out that they were right.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA) <
Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com> wrote:
> I thought it was funny from the opposite view....we have more than a few
> engineers that fancy themselves Word Smiths! I just don't have the heart to
> burst their bubble.
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.