RE: Dilbert Today

Subject: RE: Dilbert Today
From: "Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)" <Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com>
To: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:07:34 +0200

In my experienceâ.working with 3 specific engineers, they donât necessarily want to write the documentâ.they want to CRITIQUE the document. I would be a little more gracious if these guys would stick to the technical verification, and not give me the reasons why the style guide (which I have no control over) should be changed.

From: Gene Kim-Eng [mailto:techwr -at- genek -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:54 AM
To: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)
Cc: Brian -dot- Henderson -at- mitchell1 -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Dilbert Today

The comments I usually get from engineers is something along the lines of, "you repeated what I told you, but you managed to do it using half as many words." I've worked with engineers who could have done as good a job of writing their documents as I could, but just not as fast as I could. And I've NEVER worked with any engineers who actually WANTED to write their own documents. My experience with the SMEs I have worked with has been that when they told me it would have been easier for them to write a document themselves than to work with the last writer they had, most of the time it turned out that they were right.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA) <Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com<mailto:Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com>> wrote:
I thought it was funny from the opposite view....we have more than a few engineers that fancy themselves Word Smiths! I just don't have the heart to burst their bubble.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Dilbert Today: From: Brian.Henderson
Re: Dilbert Today: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: Dilbert Today: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)
Re: Dilbert Today: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: RE: Dilbert Today
Next by Author: Client/Server vs. Server/Client
Previous by Thread: Re: Dilbert Today
Next by Thread: Re: Dilbert Today


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads