TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: ROI on hiring tech comms vs. SMEs From:<laura_johnson -at- agilent -dot- com> To:<BBEGIN -at- aol -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:28:34 -0600
I agree with Peter - there's something missing. You're assuming that you'll achieve equal results with either approach, so that the only decision criterion is the cost. One way to mitigate that omission might be to try to quantify the cost of bad (or suboptimal) documentation - for example, in my domain, bad doc leads to more support calls, which have a quantifiable cost to resolve.
Learning Products Engineer
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.