RE: Content management

Subject: RE: Content management
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:52:32 -0400

Thanks to Robert for catching the FDA reference. The following all claim
to have validated compliance with FDA regulations: MasterControl,
Alfresco, ValGenesis, QUMAS, Pilgrim, and DocuShare. This includes the
dreaded, disputed Part 11 requirements for electronic records and
signatures.

I've heard that Documentum is best for the biggest document databases
(and the biggest budgets), but I never asked them for a quote.


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Lauriston
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:47 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Content management

I think ECM has supplanted EDM as the standard term for that stuff.

EMC / Documentum, ECM Livelink / OpenText, IBM Filenet, on the open
source side Alfresco, Nuexo, and of course Microsoft will tell you
SharePoint can do it and maybe it can.

You might look for a consultant / vendor with specific experience
supporting FDA compliance.

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
wrote:
> I guess I misspoke. None of the content from these documents is to be
> repurposed.
>
> What we're really looking for an easy-to-learn, easy-to-manage
> document *retrieval* system that provides thorough indexing. This may
include a
> tool such as Documentum, provided that there are sufficient training
> aids already available or consultants nearby (Sacramento) who provide
> bona fide training.




This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
RE: Content management: From: Don White
Re: Content management: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: RE: If you were making a FAQ...
Next by Author: RE: Construction terminology question
Previous by Thread: Re: Content management
Next by Thread: RE: Content management


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads