RE: Update: Data Presentation Architect / Architecture

Subject: RE: Update: Data Presentation Architect / Architecture
From: Debbie Hemstreet <D_Hemstreet -at- rambam -dot- health -dot- gov -dot- il>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 06:08:27 +0000

I'm definitely struggling with this issue these days. Now that I'm working at a hospital in Israel I have the glorious official title of "English Editor" because they didn't know what to do with "Technical Writer." (No official government positions for a technical writer.)

So when I'm given something to "edit" and provide them with a rewritten document, with recommendations for reorganizing information, redone graphics, or a request for the original PPT file to redo the graphics, etc. some are thrilled (like one Director here yesterday), and others have no idea how to respond.

I just explain nicely that the official job titles don't adequately describe what I do... the message is catching on... and at last, I'm getting busier and busier with the kind of work I love! Technical Medical Writing with Medical Marketing thrown in.

I think for some a title is important... to me, I try not to let it bother or influence me. I'm thankful I have a job! But I realize, the importance of a title is not for me, but in helping others understand just what I do, so that they can best utilize my services.

>From that perspective, Technical Writer really doesn't work for most of us. Technical Communicator (which I use on my website, for now...) also doesn't get the message across. Because our (or my) definition for "technical" is not exactly correct.

For example, if I'm writing a critical business sensitive letter from the President of the company to a potential business partner, every aspect of my technical writing skills come into play. My letter is going to be much better than the secretary's, and probably not have many changes... so was I playing secretary or technical writer?

Jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none doesn't work, because many of us ARE Jacks and Jills of all trades, and MASTERS of many! Just not necessarily the trade we are documenting. For example, I can edit a medical journal, handle the DTP, check for logic and order, detect when data doesn't match up, point out that the graphics do not convey what the author intended, or that the table could be redesigned to better display the data; because of my medical background from 30 years ago, I even have enough knowledge to know when they have erroneously referred to the liver when they meant the kidney (and I do all this) However, I will never be a master doctor... but I'll always be able to help the doctor write a better paper for publication. (Of course some doctors don't want the help... until their paper is rejected by reviewers who tell them to do everything I told them to do... and more!)

The point, define what I am? Medical Writer? Yes, but not according to the definition of the people hiring medical writers in Michigan, when I was living in the US.

At the end of the day, I find that if people SEE what I do and appreciate what I do, and I am satisfied with the remuneration I receive... the only reason these days I care about what my title is, is because OTHERS simply don't know how to use my services adequately.

So I have an official title in my job description, and when I send emails to people at work, I adjust the title to:
Editorial Assistant, RMMJ
English Editor and Writer

It still doesn't come close to what I really DO (because I'm also doing a lot of marketing writing these days).... but it works and no one is complaining.

Just my two cents worth to a discussion that will continue as long as there are "technical writers" and "technical communicators" and "Information Architects" out there.


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Update: Data Presentation Architect / Architecture: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)

Previous by Author: RE: Construction terminology question
Next by Author: RE: document design: I don't know what I don't know
Previous by Thread: Update: Data Presentation Architect / Architecture
Next by Thread: RE: Update: Data Presentation Architect / Architecture

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads