TWs and Dedicated terminals?

Subject: TWs and Dedicated terminals?
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:15:00 -0400

All,

Is there ANYBODY on this list working for a company (or other organization) that has:


- started up with an IT model of dedicated desktop terminals connecting to cloud-based (SaaS) apps and data

- switched over to dedicated desktop terminal workstations (as in the above point) from the previous model of individual PCs and locally installed software?

Or, if nobody has first-hand experience, does your employer deal with such an entity?

This is kind of a settle-an-argument request that comes out of a discussion among developers, architects, PLM ... and me... where someone noted that DELL had recently seen fit to buy WYSE (maker of terminals, since back-in-the-day).

SOMEthing has kept Wyse alive all these years, and now SOMEthing has made them attractive to a player the size of DELL (when for the past 20 years, that was not the case).

On the surface, it looks like the return of the IT-Dept. glory days, with a locked-down, un-(user-)modifiable terminal on every desk, connecting to rigidly managed and centrally controlled software instances - i.e., the mainframe and satellites model , but more scalable. Or, if you will, the kiosk model.

But of course, we _talk_ about that every few months, but most of us still run SW locally or use a general-purpose PC (laptop?) to connect to SaaS (if we do), and not a company-issued one-note terminal. . . or. . . is that changing?

I don't see that such a sea-change would mean a massive change in documentation, except that install guides would go away.

Discussion? Is your company doing the terminal thing, now? Are they going to? Does your employer have any suppliers or customers that use terminals?

Or even... is somebody on the list working for DELL-Wyse and wouldn't mind saying a few words on the topic?

-k





The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Usage question - "... un-initialized state" or "... an uninitialized state"
Next by Author: RE: monitor developer / support IM chat in background?
Previous by Thread: Re: Numbering paragraphs
Next by Thread: Re: TWs and Dedicated terminals?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads