Re: Log in vs. login

Subject: Re: Log in vs. login
From: sphilip <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
To: salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:06:02 +0700

>> I think that the programmers want to use the noun instead of the verb, and
>> they don't really see or care about any potential inconsistencies.

I'd say the user wants to accomplish a task and they care deeply about inconsistencies, which can server to confuse them, and not a jot about parts of speech (about which they are unlikely to either know or have an opinion on).

For that reason, I'd say that if you have other products that are likely to have the same user base but which already say 'Login' instead of 'Log in', I'd suggest you either change all the old products to meet the new usage or make the new product consistent with the old usage.

I could make a fairly good guess as to which of those two possibilities is the most practical...



Writer Tip: Create 10 different outputs with Doc-To-Help -- including Mobile and EPUB.

Read all about them:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Re: Log in vs. login: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: Re: Bye-bye Java: impact on technical communications?
Next by Author: Re: Log in vs. login
Previous by Thread: Re: Log in vs. login
Next by Thread: RE: Log in vs. login

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads