Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)

Subject: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)
From: phil stokes <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
To: Nick Murray <flutable -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 07:56:43 +0700

Thanks for your elaboration, Nick.

Those certainly sound like valid situations where commenting would make
sense.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?

Learn more: http://bit.ly/13xpg5n

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question): From: phil stokes
Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question): From: Nick Murray
Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question): From: phil stokes
Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question): From: Nick Murray

Previous by Author: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)
Next by Author: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)
Previous by Thread: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads