RE: The "fundamentally trivial business [of] technical writing"

Subject: RE: The "fundamentally trivial business [of] technical writing"
From: <Brian -dot- Henderson -at- mitchell1 -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:48:21 +0000

Ah gee, dad. All the kids are doin' it!


-----Original Message----- From: Matt Gras

Aiyee......... ARGH!!!!


So sad to see a writer who uses "impacts" for "affects."

--

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?

Learn more: http://bit.ly/13xpg5n

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Re: The "fundamentally trivial business [of] technical writing": From: Bill Swallow
Re: The "fundamentally trivial business [of] technical writing": From: Matt Gras

Previous by Author: RE: Justifying FM
Next by Author: RE: Need a collective noun
Previous by Thread: Re: The "fundamentally trivial business [of] technical writing"
Next by Thread: Re: The "fundamentally trivial business [of] technical writing"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads