Re: "mock", not "mock-up", as a noun ?

Subject: Re: "mock", not "mock-up", as a noun ?
From: Nick Murray <flutable -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:29:05 +1000

Mocked objects are used for testing purposes. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mock_object

The (test) objects are often referred to as "mocks". "Mock it" means to use a mocking (software) framework to assist with the testing process.

On 31/07/2013 7:57 AM, Monique Semp wrote:

Somewhat related to the recent âverb noun install failâ thread and changing word usage, I just saw âmock it ...â instead of âmock it up...â, and âmocks should be sufficientâ instead of âmock-ups should be sufficientâ.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

Follow-Ups:

References:
"mock", not "mock-up", as a noun ?: From: Monique Semp

Previous by Author: Re: Why is so hard to for majority Chinese companies to take documentation seriously?
Next by Author: RE: a RoboHelp/html question
Previous by Thread: Re: "mock", not "mock-up", as a noun ?
Next by Thread: Re: "mock", not "mock-up", as a noun ?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads