Re: Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?

Subject: Re: Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?
From: John Posada <jposada99 -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:09:43 -0400

I am the doc author for my department (AML Compliancr) docs. My docs
include 3 procedure manuals; 850 pages, 700 pages, and 1400 pages. My docs
are used during department audits by internal and external audits.

Anothet person on my team just handles the audits.
On Aug 14, 2013 3:32 AM, "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:15:14 -0400, McLauchlan, Kevin <
> Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- **com <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>>
> wrote:
>
> well.... complied. Did some research on items where I'd previously said
>> nothing or said stuff differently than they wanted it said. Rewrote a few
>> sections. Took the opportunity to tune up some areas that they weren't even
>> concerned about, because I liked their approach.
>>
>
> The only problem arises if the company does the stuff ONE way and the
> auditors want it done ANOTHER WAY. You suddenly serve two masters.
>
> Long ago my friend was documenting the bookkeeping methods at a company,
> preparatory to moving it to a computerized operation. There was a slight
> problem--the owner kept two sets of books, one for himself, and one for the
> IRS. Quittin' time!
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for
> authoring.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jposada99 -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- **com <techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/**email-discussion-groups/<http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/>for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?: From: Simon
RE: Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?: From: Peter Neilson

Previous by Author: "desk level procedures" ?
Next by Author: OT: Monster strikes again!
Previous by Thread: Re: Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?
Next by Thread: Weird HTML problem


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads