TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I already posted a similar message to the MadCap forum so the purpose of
this message is to explore this as a broader issue and hopefully discover
some best practices.
I am a brand-new (1 month) user of MadCap Flare, but a long time Adobe
FrameMaker and Microsoft Word technical writer. Recently, I have
encountered major issues with images when publishing a Flare project to a
PDF file. The problem is that, at less than 100% zoom level, images are
oddly pixelated (badly rendered).To add some clarity, my images are
generally inserted at slightly greater than 300 DPI. So, I am using
slightly higher than normal resolution... maintaining a balance of file
size vs image quality considerations.
I don't recall running into such image problems under Word or FrameMaker so
my finger is pointing is pointing at Flare.
After some experimentation, I found that by integrating GhostScript with
Flare, I can use .eps [vector] images, the results are images that render
perfect at all zoom levels, inside a PDF.
Part 1 of 2 solved! That is because the .eps format will obviously only
work on vector friendly images, like our corporate logo. Now, what do I do
about screen captures? Screen captures are a very important part of my
documentation. Any thoughts?
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.