TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: PDF image quality challenge From:Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io> Date:Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:45:24 -0700
>It sounds like Flare is inappropriately resizing images for PDF.
Something is up in Flare. Like I previously mentioned, I never encountered
such a problem in either FrameMaker or Word.
I need to work on content now, so I'll revisit this problem over the
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>wrote:
> From the Creating Single Source Images topic in Flare's help:
> "The typical DPI setting for images displayed in an Internet browser
> is usually somewhere between 72 and 96. The DPI is automatically set
> for online output when you capture the image, depending on the
> computer that you are using. However, the DPI setting for printed
> output often needs to be higher (say, 300 DPI). "
> Actually, a dpi somewhere around 72 to 96 (comparable to the
> resolution of computer displays) is the setting that will make screen
> captures easily readable in printed output and 100% zoom in Acrobat.
> The same 72-96 dpi is also good for browsers since you're viewing the
> screen shot on a screen of roughly that resolution.
> It sounds like Flare is inappropriately resizing images for PDF.
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > My first attempt at a new thread. Please be kind.
> > I already posted a similar message to the MadCap forum so the purpose of
> > this message is to explore this as a broader issue and hopefully discover
> > some best practices.
> > I am a brand-new (1 month) user of MadCap Flare, but a long time Adobe
> > FrameMaker and Microsoft Word technical writer. Recently, I have
> > encountered major issues with images when publishing a Flare project to a
> > PDF file. The problem is that, at less than 100% zoom level, images are
> > oddly pixelated (badly rendered).To add some clarity, my images are
> > generally inserted at slightly greater than 300 DPI. So, I am using
> > slightly higher than normal resolution... maintaining a balance of file
> > size vs image quality considerations.
> > I don't recall running into such image problems under Word or FrameMaker
> > my finger is pointing is pointing at Flare.
> > After some experimentation, I found that by integrating GhostScript with
> > Flare, I can use .eps [vector] images, the results are images that render
> > perfect at all zoom levels, inside a PDF.
> > Part 1 of 2 solved! That is because the .eps format will obviously only
> > work on vector friendly images, like our corporate logo. Now, what do I
> > about screen captures? Screen captures are a very important part of my
> > documentation. Any thoughts?
> > Thank you,
> > --
> > Shawn Connelly
> > technical writer
<http://convergent.io> <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io>
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.