Re: Tools statistics

Subject: Re: Tools statistics
From: Scott Turner <quills -at- airmail -dot- net>
To: "peter -at- knowhowpro -dot- com" <peter -at- knowhowpro -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:18:02 -0500

Thanks for the link on the perceived bugs.

After reviewing them I find that the only one that I have encountered is the Find focus issue. To categorize it as making it unusable seems extreme to me. I have bigger issues with the Windows behaviors and my network inconsistencies which, for me, cause true usability problems.

The user preferences will always color the perception if a tools usability.

Scott T.

> On Sep 24, 2013, at 12:45, Peter Gold <peter -at- knowhowpro -dot- com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Robert:
>
> Thanks so much for posting the link to the Adobe FrameMaker forum.
>
> I searched techwr-l.com's archives using your subject below, but couldn't
> find your post. I searched Google with the subject in quotes, and found it
> at frameusers.com.
>
> http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/2012-February/024930.html
>
> âI sympathize with you that many of your FrameMaker preferred working
> techniques and tools âwere, and seemed to remain, disappointingly buggy.
>
> Your posted lists are tremendously helpful, because they will save folks
> some time and effort by making the issues clear to those who use
> FrameMaker, and those who are considering it.
>
> Thanks!â
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
> _______________________
> Peter Gold
> KnowHow ProServices
> â
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>wrote:
>
>> I posted a list here last February with the subject "workarounds for
>> FM10 UI bugs?"
>>
>> Similar list on Adobe's FM forum:
>>
>> http://forums.adobe.com/message/4204388#4204388
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Peter Gold <peter -at- knowhowpro -dot- com> wrote:
>>> Hi, Robert:
>>>
>>> Since you've obviously got preferences based on experiences, it would be
>>> tremendously helpful to folks on this list, if you would take a bit of
>> time
>>> to name some of the specific bugs and issues that have formed your
>> opinion.
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as quills -at- airmail -dot- net -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Tools statistics: From: Peter Gold

Previous by Author: Re: Tools statistics
Next by Author: Re: Tools statistics
Previous by Thread: Re: Tools statistics
Next by Thread: Re: Tools statistics


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads