Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop

Subject: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop
From: Michael Wyland <michael -at- sumptionandwyland -dot- com>
To: Techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:33:11 -0600

To all:

Any thoughts on which is better? I have the paid version of Copernic,
which allows me to index network drives as well as local drives. The
searching seems to work well, but I have occasional doubts about files I *
*should** be able to find but seemingly can't.


Michael L. Wyland

Sumption & Wyland

818 South Hawthorne Avenue

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104-4537

(605) 336-0244 or (888) 4-SUMPTION

Web site:

LinkedIn Profile:

New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Previous by Author: Re: Question about Google Plus vanity URLs
Next by Author: Re: Printing a booklet
Previous by Thread: TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for November 8, 2013
Next by Thread: Re: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads