Re: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop

Subject: Re: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Michael Wyland <michael -at- sumptionandwyland -dot- com>, Techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:08:20 -0800

Next time you can't find a file, try Agent Ransack.

Any index-based search will miss things that have not yet been indexed.

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Michael Wyland
<michael -at- sumptionandwyland -dot- com> wrote:

> Any thoughts on which is better? I have the paid version of Copernic,
> which allows me to index network drives as well as local drives. The
> searching seems to work well, but I have occasional doubts about files I *
> *should** be able to find but seemingly can't.

New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop: From: Michael Wyland

Previous by Author: Re: Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?
Next by Author: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Previous by Thread: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop
Next by Thread: RE: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads