Re: Critique of a sample

Subject: Re: Critique of a sample
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "Janoff, Steven" <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- ga -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:07:59 -0800

How big was this poster intended to be?

Monitor viewing may be deceptive, but my first impression is that visually
the test seems undersized and doesn't stand out. The circles and arrows
could be bolder as well.

I can't give you a totally outsider POV, since I have past experience with
DNA sequencers, but other than my impressions about readability it seems
clear enough to me.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Janoff, Steven <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- ga -dot- com>wrote:

> .
> I'm curious how it looks in general even to those outside the intended
> audience (scientists performing DNA sequencing runs on these machines). Is
> it evident what this is about on first look, or is it confusing?
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Critique of a sample: From: Janoff, Steven

Previous by Author: Re: ghost town
Next by Author: Re: Critique of a sample
Previous by Thread: Critique of a sample
Next by Thread: RE: Critique of a sample

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads