Re: Newer or later?

Subject: Re: Newer or later?
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Jim Witkin <jameswitkin -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:19:26 -0800

I'd use "higher," because I've actually seen companies release a v3.0 for
some customers and then go back and do a v2.5 for others.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jim Witkin <jameswitkin -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> Today I'm writing about updating firmware and got into this debate with one
> of the engineers. If you have firmware version 6.1, would you refer to this
> version as "newer" or "later" than version 6.0 or would you choose a
> different term.
> I'm trying to communicate that any version after release 6.0 will work. So
> which sentence is preferred?
> "Verify that the firmware version is 6.0 or newer."
> "Verify that the firmware version is 6.0 or later."
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Newer or later?: From: Jim Witkin

Previous by Author: Re: ghost town
Next by Author: Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -
Previous by Thread: Newer or later?
Next by Thread: Re: Newer or later?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads