Re: Newer or later?

Subject: Re: Newer or later?
From: Evelyn Lee Barney <evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: Natalie Cavier <ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:46:14 +0000 (UTC)

Now that 'higher' is in the mix - i have to agree.



* www.linkedin.com/in/evelynleebarney/

----- Original Message -----

I agree with Gene. I always use the term "higher" in this instance.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:

> I'd use "higher," because I've actually seen companies release a v3.0 for
> some customers and then go back and do a v2.5 for others.
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jim Witkin <jameswitkin -at- gmail -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
> > Today I'm writing about updating firmware and got into this debate with
> one
> > of the engineers. If you have firmware version 6.1, would you refer to
> this
> > version as "newer" or "later" than version 6.0 or would you choose a
> > different term.
> >
> > I'm trying to communicate that any version after release 6.0 will work.
> So
> > which sentence is preferred?
> >
> > "Verify that the firmware version is 6.0 or newer."
> > "Verify that the firmware version is 6.0 or later."
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any
> screen.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>



--
Natalie Cavier
DeanHouston, Inc.
1520-E N. Mountain Avenue, Suite 206
Ontario, CA 91762
Office: 909.422.1706 | Mobile: 530.521.2335
ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com
www.deanhouston.com

This electronic mail message contains information which is (a) LEGALLY
PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM
DISCLOSURE, and/or (b) intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) named
herein. If you are not the Addressee(s), or person responsible for
delivering this to the Addressee(s), you are hereby notified that reading,
copying, or distributing this message is prohibited. If you have received
this electronic mail message in error, please contact the mail Sender(s) by
replying to this electronic mail message and take the steps necessary to
delete the message from your computer.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Newer or later?: From: Jim Witkin
Re: Newer or later?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Newer or later?: From: Natalie Cavier

Previous by Author: RE: Question from a re-virginized newbie
Next by Author: Categoriesin a Parts Catalog
Previous by Thread: Re: Newer or later?
Next by Thread: RE: Newer or later?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads