Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?

Subject: Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:43:55 -0800

That's all jargon, so it doesn't belong in work product. I have no
reason to use the phrase "technical communications" outside of
professional forums like this one.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> wrote:
> Hello, Whirlers,
> I have seen both "techcom" and "techcomm" as well as "marcom" and "marcomm."
> What are your preferred constructions? Or, do you simply want consistency in the same document?
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


"techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?: From: Cardimon, Craig

Previous by Author: crappy search engines [was: Re: ghost town]
Next by Author: Re: Greasy fingerprints (was Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore)
Previous by Thread: Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?
Next by Thread: Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads