Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?

Subject: Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?
From: Maxwell Hoffmann <mhoffman -at- adobe -dot- com>
To: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:31:23 +0000

I frequently see "marcom" and "marcomm" used in job descriptions up in the Pacific Northwest. Most job listings involving "techcomm" just ask for "writer". <dictated on Hello Kitty iPhone via Siri >



_____________________________
Maxwell Hoffmann | Product Evangelist | Adobe | p. 503.336.5952 | c. 503.805.3719 | mhoffman -at- adobe -dot- com
http://twitter.com/maxwellhoffmann - http://www.linkedin.com/in/maxwellhoffmann
blogs.adobe.com/techcomm
Upcoming webinar calendar: http://adobe.ly/Pbz6xI

> On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:44 AM, "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> wrote:
>
> That's all jargon, so it doesn't belong in work product. I have no
> reason to use the phrase "technical communications" outside of
> professional forums like this one.
>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> wrote:
>> Hello, Whirlers,
>>
>> I have seen both "techcom" and "techcomm" as well as "marcom" and "marcomm."
>>
>> What are your preferred constructions? Or, do you simply want consistency in the same document?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as mhoffman -at- adobe -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
"techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: RE: Question from a re-virginized newbie
Next by Author: RE: Professional how-to videos
Previous by Thread: Re: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?
Next by Thread: Re: {Possibly Forged} TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 100, Issue 12


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads