Re: RTFM? Really?

Subject: Re: RTFM? Really?
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Mike Starr <mike -at- writestarr -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:58:53 -0700

It's been years since I distinguished between a printed manual, PDF, online help or embedded docs, help, tutorials or videos. It's all documentation, and except for the embedded stuff that takes users by the hand it all requires some investment in time and effort on the part of the user.

Gene Kim-Eng


On 9/26/2014 10:34 AM, Mike Starr wrote:

So, maybe instead of RTFM, we should just say RTFD (Read The F***ing Documentation) and separate the delivery method from the fact that there actually is adequate documentation even if the customer doesn't bother with it.Nancy's got a really good point. We do the best we can to provide whatever assistance we can to our customers. How we deliver that assistance is secondary to actually getting our customers to consult that assistance. It doesn't matter whether it's on paper, a PDF, online help or whatever... if our customers fail to avail themselves of what we've created for them, they're going to pick up the phone.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Re: RTFM? Really?: From: Nancy Allison
Re: RTFM? Really?: From: Mike Starr

Previous by Author: Re: RTFM? Really?
Next by Author: Re: RTFM? Really?
Previous by Thread: Re: RTFM? Really?
Next by Thread: Re: Re: RTFM? Really?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads