TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Flare or Frame as an intermediary for migrating to DITA?
Subject:Re: Flare or Frame as an intermediary for migrating to DITA? From:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> To:"Janoff, Steven" <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:38:47 -0700
I wouldn't use FrameMaker as an intermediary. It's not very good at
Flare does a pretty clean job of importing Word and FrameMaker, and
can export to DITA. However, I'm not sure that would save you any time
over using whatever native tools your DITA environment has. Worth a
try but I would not expect much if any of the content to be tagged
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Janoff, Steven
<Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com> wrote:
> Short version of the question: If you're converting legacy content from unstructured to structured in XML/DITA, and let's say you have or will have a CCMS with either a built-in XML editor or a third-party one like oXygen or XMetaL... Would it make sense to use either Flare or Structured FrameMaker as your intermediary to convert unstructured content to XML/DITA and then export to your CCMS with editor?
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l