Re: Choosing a base style guide

Subject: Re: Choosing a base style guide
From: Kelly Smith <KellyMJSmith -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:57:04 -0400

Thanks, Robert.

This is the direction I was leaning - thinking we may want both because
they serve different purposes.


On Oct 16, 2014 4:17 PM, "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> wrote:
> When you're writing about software, the MS Manual of Style is much
> better than any general style guide.
> It's my primary style guide. I occasionally refer to Chicago when MMS
> doesn't cover something.
> I ignore much of MS's guidelines on writing procedures, the advanced
> users I write for don't need long, wordy descriptions of UI
> navigation.

Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Choosing a base style guide: From: Kelly Smith
Re: Choosing a base style guide: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: Choosing a base style guide
Next by Author: Re: Has technical writing fallen from grace?
Previous by Thread: Re: Choosing a base style guide
Next by Thread: RE: Choosing a base style guide

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads