TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Choosing a base style guide From:Kelly Smith <KellyMJSmith -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> Date:Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:57:04 -0400
This is the direction I was leaning - thinking we may want both because
they serve different purposes.
On Oct 16, 2014 4:17 PM, "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> wrote:
> When you're writing about software, the MS Manual of Style is much
> better than any general style guide.
> It's my primary style guide. I occasionally refer to Chicago when MMS
> doesn't cover something.
> I ignore much of MS's guidelines on writing procedures, the advanced
> users I write for don't need long, wordy descriptions of UI
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l