TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Thanks Bridget, you might be correct with just simply writing "compatible
with all models"
I guess the question is, why use the prefix, "inter" and how does this
prefix change the meaning of adjective, "compatible"?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Bridget Gordan <bridget -dot- gordan -at- gmail -dot- com>
> Why not just Compatible with all models? Do you need intra/cross? I think
> compatible suffices.
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Kathleen MacDowell <
> kathleen -dot- eamd -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>> Couldn't you just say 'cross-compatible'?
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT