Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"

Subject: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
From: Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com>
To: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:04:00 -0800

> Are "system models" some sort of building blocks, you can use as many as
are appropriate for a particular project, and they automatically work
together?

Exactly true for building blocks, use as many as required, and they work
together - automatically.


On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
wrote:

> That doesn't help. I don't know what the difference would be if you
> couldn't mix and match them.
>
> Are "system models" some sort of building blocks, you can use as many
> as are appropriate for a particular project, and they automatically
> work together?
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply Robert.
> >
> > Mix-and-match is being used in the literal sense. Meaning, all our system
> > models can work together as a single cohesive unit. They are all
> compatible
> > with each other.
> >
> > I hope this explanation gives you enough context.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "Mix and match widgets" and "inter-compatibility with all widgets"
> >> don't seem like the same concept so it's hard to guess what you're
> >> trying to say. Can you describe the functionality?
>



--
*Shawn Connelly*
Technical writer
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match": From: Shawn
Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match": From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
Next by Author: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
Previous by Thread: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
Next by Thread: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads