Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"

Subject: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Shawn C <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:20:38 -0800

That doesn't help. I don't know what the difference would be if you
couldn't mix and match them.

Are "system models" some sort of building blocks, you can use as many
as are appropriate for a particular project, and they automatically
work together?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Robert.
> Mix-and-match is being used in the literal sense. Meaning, all our system
> models can work together as a single cohesive unit. They are all compatible
> with each other.
> I hope this explanation gives you enough context.
> Thanks
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> wrote:
>> "Mix and match widgets" and "inter-compatibility with all widgets"
>> don't seem like the same concept so it's hard to guess what you're
>> trying to say. Can you describe the functionality?
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match": From: Shawn

Previous by Author: Re: Possessive form of name ending with apostrophe?
Next by Author: Re: Possessive form of name ending with apostrophe?
Previous by Thread: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
Next by Thread: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads