TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Mix-and-match is being used in the literal sense. Meaning, all our system
models can work together as a single cohesive unit. They are all compatible
with each other.
I hope this explanation gives you enough context.
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
wrote:
> "Mix and match widgets" and "inter-compatibility with all widgets"
> don't seem like the same concept so it's hard to guess what you're
> trying to say. Can you describe the functionality?
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:
> > I am writing a technical paper and one of the stakeholders suggested
> using
> > the idiom, "mix-and-match". I am loath to use an idiom.
> >
> > For instance, it is being used in the following bullet point:
> > - Mix and match Dyna models
> >
> > One idea is to change it to:
> > - Inter-compatibility with all Dyna models.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest an improved but succinct replacement that might be
> more
> > suitable for this paper?
>
--
*Shawn Connelly*
Technical writer
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT