Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"

Subject: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: "shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com" <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:33:45 -0800

I haven't read every message. Has anyone suggested "interchangeable" or

On another scale, who is your audience and why would an idiom not
be suitable?

This page might have some ideas you could steal -- er, trigger some ideas...

I kind of like "interlocking".


On Friday, March 6, 2015, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:

> I am writing a technical paper and one of the stakeholders suggested using
> the idiom, "mix-and-match". I am loath to use an idiom.
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Replacement for "mix-and-match": From: Shawn

Previous by Author: Re: Possessive form of name ending with apostrophe?
Next by Author: Alternative tool for creating & maintaining PowerPoint training decks?
Previous by Thread: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"
Next by Thread: Re: Replacement for "mix-and-match"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads