Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?

Subject: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
From: Lin Sims <ljsims -dot- ml -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:13:18 -0400

In the nuclear missile corp, they have something they call the "two-man
rule", meaning it takes two separate people to authorize a launch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-man_rule

Is that something like what you're talking about?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:30:46 -0400, Robert Fekete <
> fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your help and ideas. Unfortunately, we really need a way
>> to name the type of the authorization, because this is a prominent
>> feature of the product, and heavily used in marketing communication as well.
>>
>
> Oh, then this is a /marketing/ issue, not a tech-writing issue, just as
> long as marketing does not choose something that is completely misleading
> or is offensive to most of the customers.
>
> Let the imagination fly, neologolizing at full speed. They could call it
> disredundant, or multipastural, or diphrasic, or rhetoluctural. I don't
> think anybody's used any of those terms before. And I'm not going to check,
> either. Some years ago I looked up my wholly mythical diphenhydrazine (NOT
> diphenhydramine, which is Benadryl and Sominex) I was amazed at what I
> found. (If it existed diphenhydrazine would be a rocket fuel.)
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ljsims -dot- ml -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>



--
Lin Sims
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete
RE: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH)
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Peter Neilson

Previous by Author: Re: Article about NASA technical writers?
Next by Author: Re: Web governance documentation?
Previous by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Next by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads