Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?

Subject: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
From: Robert Fekete <fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:19:16 +0200

First of all, many thanks for all of you for the ideas!

@Bridget: Two-person integrity is, as far as I understand, for accessing
information, not for performing actions.

@Margaret: Dual Control Authorization and @Lin: two-man rule: These sounds
about right, my only concern with them is that they suggest (at least to
me) that two person have the same authority, and are interchangeable, which
is not the case in our product. Nevertheless, we may end up using one of
these.

@Peter (and your wife) and @Robert: Require sign-off sounds interesting,
I'll run it within our team.


On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
wrote:

> "Double sign-off" sounds like three people.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
> wrote:
> > My wife the quality engineer says that in her labs they called it "double
> > sign-off". (No diphrasic or multipastural anti-words required!)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete
RE: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH)
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Next by Author: Re: mysterious white line in table rows
Previous by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Next by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads