Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?

Subject: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
From: Ryan Young <ryangyoung -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Robert Fekete <fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:22:39 -0700

We're looking at implementing an M of N feature and people referred to it
as segregation of duties. Then defined each permission: initiate-only,
execute-only, etc.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robert Fekete <fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com>
wrote:

> First of all, many thanks for all of you for the ideas!
>
> @Bridget: Two-person integrity is, as far as I understand, for accessing
> information, not for performing actions.
>
> @Margaret: Dual Control Authorization and @Lin: two-man rule: These sounds
> about right, my only concern with them is that they suggest (at least to
> me) that two person have the same authority, and are interchangeable, which
> is not the case in our product. Nevertheless, we may end up using one of
> these.
>
> @Peter (and your wife) and @Robert: Require sign-off sounds interesting,
> I'll run it within our team.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
> > "Double sign-off" sounds like three people.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
> > wrote:
> > > My wife the quality engineer says that in her labs they called it
> "double
> > > sign-off". (No diphrasic or multipastural anti-words required!)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> > http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ryangyoung -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete
RE: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH)
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete

Previous by Author: Re: Future Tech Writer with Software Questions
Next by Author: Re: Documenting .Net APIs
Previous by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Next by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads