Re: manual vs white paper

Subject: Re: manual vs white paper
From: Ryan Haber <ryan -dot- haber -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Haim Roman <haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:09:29 -0400

Oh, dang. Yeah. Sorry, Gina. I misread the first few words. Thanks, Haim.


All the best,
Ryan

[image: --]

Ryan Haber
[image: http://]5151 Dudley Ln.
Bethesda, MD 20814
301-908-3049
about.me/ryan.haber

<http://about.me/ryan.haber?promo=email_sig>


On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Haim Roman <haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> If I understood Gina correctly, her client told her to merge 2 documents
> that have different styles (writing, not Word) & functions. And she's
> trying to avoid that.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Howard (Haim) Roman -- haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com -- 052-8-592-599 -- ×××× ××××
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Ryan Haber <ryan -dot- haber -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>
> > Why not just send the client only the text as you want it published? Or
> > maybe send two versions - one for the user manual, and the other clearly
> > labeled as not for the user manual.
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow. If you are looking for the client to edit the
> paper
> > into a final form, that doesn't seem likely to go well.
> >
> >
> > All the best,
> > Ryan
> >
> > [image: --]
> >
> > Ryan Haber
> > [image: http://]5151 Dudley Ln.
> > Bethesda, MD 20814
> > 301-908-3049
> > about.me/ryan.haber
> >
> > <http://about.me/ryan.haber?promo=email_sig>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Gina Jones <gina -dot- techwriter -at- gmail -dot- com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I was recently sent a white paper as is, with instructions to insert
> the
> > > content as a new topic within the relevant chapter of a user manual I
> am
> > > working on.
> > >
> > > To maintain writing consistency and keep out pre-sale narrative, I'm
> > going
> > > to suggest appending the white paper to the manual or including a
> > > cross-reference to the site it's published on. Is there an alternative
> to
> > > these options? Can you think of additional reasons or have any advice
> on
> > > persuading my client to go this route?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gina
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> > > http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
> > >
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ryan -dot- haber -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > >
> > >
> > > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> and
> > > info.
> > >
> > > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> > online
> > > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> > >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> > http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |
> http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ryan -dot- haber -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
manual vs white paper: From: Gina Jones
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Ryan Haber
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Haim Roman

Previous by Author: Re: manual vs white paper
Next by Author: Re: Word 2010 print disparity
Previous by Thread: Re: manual vs white paper
Next by Thread: Re: manual vs white paper


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads