Re: manual vs white paper

Subject: Re: manual vs white paper
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Sharon Metzger <sharon -dot- metzger -at- gmail -dot- com>, 'Gina Jones' <gina -dot- techwriter -at- gmail -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:53:29 -0700

Sounds like it should be a reference in the body of the manual to the white paper in an appendix.

Gene Kim-Eng
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
manual vs white paper: From: Gina Jones
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Ryan Haber
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Haim Roman
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Gina Jones
RE: manual vs white paper: From: Sharon Metzger

Previous by Author: Re: One space (or two) after a paragraph?
Next by Author: RE: Large Flare projects (2,000+ pages)
Previous by Thread: RE: manual vs white paper
Next by Thread: Re: manual vs white paper


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads