Re: Into the Frying Pan

Subject: Re: Into the Frying Pan
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:44:06 -0700

The Cute PDF Pro application lists commenting as one of its features, but doesn't say whether PDFs it creates can be commented to by anything other than Cute PDF Pro. So no idea if reviewers with the free version or Acrobat Reader can comment.

Your deadline, tool support and manager issues make me think more along the lines of not having a paddle than frying pans.

Gene Kim-Eng

On 10/1/2015 5:22 AM, Chris Morton wrote:

(I've considered distributing a PDF and letting others comment on it, but
we don't so much as have access to Acrobat Pro. Corporate endorses CutePDF,
but I've never worked with it. Would the standard Acrobat Reader suffice?

What other methodologies have worked for you in such a situation?

Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Into the Frying Pan: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: what's the current trend?
Next by Author: Re: Into the Frying Pan
Previous by Thread: RE: [RMX:NL] Into the Frying Pan
Next by Thread: Re: Into the Frying Pan

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads