TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Professional Engineer licenses are issued by state governments.
Looking at the relevant California agency, there's no general
continuing education requirement. Why should there be? Some
specialties don't change much from decade to decade, others require at
least one class a year to keep up to date with the latest changes in
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Monique Semp
<monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net> wrote:
>> I'd see it as a major negative on a resume.
> Hmm; how so? I'd think that the worst that could happen is that a resume
> reader doesn't know what it means.
>> but to keep your certificate current you need to take part in various
> STC activities or take college courses related to technical writing.
> I believe it's pretty standard for certifications to require continuing
> education. I know for certainty that the PE (professional engineer) license
> requires you to take (or teach) a certain number of classes every year or
> two in order to maintain your license/certification.
> And I think it a good thing. Just because one is current with technologies
> and skills when a license/certification is obtained doesn't guarantee that
> in 10 years anything new has been magically gleaned/learned. So taking
> courses ensures a minimal level of continued participation in a professional
> (I do agree that there are many legitimate concerns about this particular
> certification. And as I said, I am not planning to pursue it. But I do not
> agree that every aspect of the certification is bogus/sham/whatever. It's
> not perfect, but it's an important first step to advancing the field of
> technical communications in a way that's similar to many other professions.
> And as far as I know, there's no better alternative.)
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com