Re: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?

Subject: Re: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?
From: Marguerite <mkrupp128 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: Michael Wyland <michael -at- sumptionandwyland -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:36:54 -0500

In the late 60s and early 70s, at least, Honeywell did the same. Never could quite figure out why.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Michael Wyland <michael -at- sumptionandwyland -dot- com> wrote:
>
> To all:
>
> I'm looking to document trivia I know to be true because I lived through it.
>
> In the mid-1970s, the Washington Post revised its style manual to mandate the dropping of the second "e" in words like "employee" and "trustee." For a time, "employe" and "truste" were used in all Washington Post news articles and features. The Post's ombudsman wrote a column decrying the silliness of the change. After a time (months? a couple of years?) the style manual was revised again to once again allow words ending in "ee" to be so spelled in the newspaper.
>
> Question: how best to find the documents? I've done Google searches and, as yet, have been unable to find archived copies of the style guide. I'll go looking for the ombudsman's column, but I can't remember his name. Ideas?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Michael L. Wyland
> Sumption & Wyland
> 818 South Hawthorne Avenue
> Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104-4537
> (605) 336-0244 or (888) 4-SUMPTION
>
> Celebrating our 25th Anniversary - 1990-2015
>
> Web site: http://www.sumptionandwyland.com
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelwyland
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as mkrupp128 -at- yahoo -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Washington Post style guide from 1970s?: From: Michael Wyland

Previous by Author: RE: least awful approach for keeping training slides up to date with core doc updates
Next by Author: Re: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?
Previous by Thread: RE: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?
Next by Thread: RE: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads