Re: Developments in the review cycle

Subject: Re: Developments in the review cycle
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:21:40 -0700

I don't know about the market as a whole, but deteriorating
documentation is one reason I'm using Adobe and Microsoft products
much less than I used to.

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH)
<gregory -dot- sweet -at- health -dot- ny -dot- gov> wrote:
> Isn't this exactly what Adobe, Microsoft, Cisco, et.al, are doing with their user communities & forums? Documentation is expensive, if you can get away without writing it, and better yet, get the users to write it for you for free, your bottom line is looking a lot better.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Steve Hudson
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH)

Previous by Author: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Author: Re: LinkedIn - Facebook for Professionals? or is it really "Myspace"
Previous by Thread: RE: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Thread: Re: Developments in the review cycle


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads