Re: "Creative Technical Writing"

Subject: Re: "Creative Technical Writing"
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Keith Hood <bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:12:17 -0700

Water can be made to go uphill, but it requires energy, so nobody decides to make it happen without a purpose. Unlike a lot of software revisions.

Gene Kim-Eng

On 7/1/2016 3:25 PM, Keith Hood wrote:

And they didn't use "Agile" methods. The waterfall model was beautiful in that it made the end result entirely predictable - water falls in only one direction.

Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Re: "Creative Technical Writing": From: Keith Hood

Previous by Author: RE: community manager
Next by Author: Re: "Creative Technical Writing"
Previous by Thread: FW: "Creative Technical Writing"
Next by Thread: Re: Reference Architecture document

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads