TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Yes, that's what I was trying to say, that the Pro version is required to
create shared review PDFs that could be used by Reader users as shared
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
> if you create a shared review pdf using the Standard version of Acrobat
>> that the reviewers must ALSO have the full
> Acrobat? I seem to have missed that little tidbit, and my users have been
> very frustrated when trying to use a shared review when all they have is
> Yes, I believe it's been this way for a very long time, and is the primary
> reason why I've always insisted that I be provided Acrobat Pro instead of
> Standard. The other reasonâat least in the recent past; might not be the
> case with the current Acrobat DC (vs. older versions); was definitely not
> the case a really long time agoâis that the Pro version is required to
> create comment-enabled PDFs for reviewers who have only the free Reader
> I searched for a full list of Pro vs. Standard features, but couldn't find
> it this time.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com