Re: criteria for choosing tools ?

Subject: Re: criteria for choosing tools ?
From: Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "Elisa R. Sawyer" <elisawyer -at- gmail -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:17:06 -0400 (GMT-04:00)

> since you are incorporating Markdown and want non-writers to have
access, you might want to take a look at lightweight markup
Thanks, Elisa! I've been interested in Sphinx for a while, and now does
seem to be the ideal time to investigate further. I'm on the #sphinx
channel of the Write the Docs network (Slack), and so will read back
through that a bit and ask questions when I get to trying it out :-).
It will be a couple of weeks, though, as I'm putting the tools on the
back burner for a brief time so I can write a couple of high-priority
docs in the existing (engineer-designed/implemented) Jekyll toolchain.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Previous by Author: Re: Which skill to acquire
Next by Author: Re: User Documentation in Agile Development Teams
Previous by Thread: Re: criteria for choosing tools ?
Next by Thread: TechWhirl Fast 5 â Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2017 Release) Tips and Tricks

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads