TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: about use of single bullets From:Daniel Friedman <daniel -dot- friedman42 -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> Date:Wed, 10 May 2017 08:58:35 -0400
To further what Tony is saying, I will use a single bullet list for a one
step procedure. It keeps the consistency of having procedures be indented,
but without the weirdness of having a numbered list that only has item '1. '
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> wrote:
> Considering that there could be a chance that bulleted lists could be
> automatically generated, I'm of the mind that single item lists are
> acceptable. This holds especially true of the other sections all use
> bullets. It looks odd when three sections appear parallel except for one,
> because of blind adherence to a academic rule that breaks the visual model.
>
> But of course, it all depends.
>
> -Tony
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 17:26 Vincent <vincentpr -at- trfnova -dot- com> wrote:
>
> > Soliciting your opinions (or declaration of practice)...
> > I know the style rule of thumb not to use a bullet for a single item.
> > However for a two page flyer, I have several subheaders with multiple
> > items bulleted -- except for the first one which has only one item.
> >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as daniel -dot- friedman42 -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
*Daniel Friedman*
*friedmantechdocs.com* <http://friedmantechdocs.com>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com