Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

Subject: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
From: Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:52:13 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

>People who are into hacking command lines are mavens of esoterica.
>(just like some tech writers) thrive on weird words and convoluted
>constructions. They'll appreciate "via" and will know the
>between i.e. and e.g. They might know that viz. is a medieval
>for videlicet. They are good in C and assembler. Maybe they even
>in FORTH.
>Know your audience.

:-). Yep, most likely this is my audience. And, it's me, to a great
degree :-).
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Previous by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Previous by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads