Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

Subject: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
From: Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>, Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:53:48 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

>It's passive voice. Blows my mind that this thread has been going
on all
>day and nobody has said anything about that.
>

? How is "Share a Custom View via URL" in passive voice? Seems like a
simple imperative command.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Author: Re: Word tool/plugin recommendation?
Previous by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads