Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

Subject: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>, Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:37:33 -0700

David beat me to the reply. :)

On 8/3/2017 8:44 AM, David Artman wrote:

it could be "Use a URL to
send a Custom View".

On 8/3/2017 7:53 AM, Monique Semp wrote:

? How is "Share a Custom View via URL" in passive voice? Seems like a simple imperative command.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Re: "via" - why often verboten ?: From: Monique Semp

Previous by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Previous by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Thread: RE: "via" - why often verboten ?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads