Re: shoot, shot or . . .

Subject: Re: shoot, shot or . . .
From: Carolyn Palo <carolynpalo -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Natalie Cavier <ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:01:02 -0400

"We examined the problem thoroughly." But if "troubleshot" is proper, then
yes.

Carolyn Palo

Professional Writer
"Bridging Innovation"
Phone: 617-491-0551
Email: carolynpalo -at- gmail -dot- com
Business Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/carolynpalo
Creative Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolyn-palo-9272b299/
Blog: https://thoughtwindowsbycarolynjpalo.wordpress.com/




On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Natalie Cavier <ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com>
wrote:

> I agree with Lynne. Simplicity is always best course of action.
> It may sound odd to our ears, but it is correct to use "troubleshot."
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Wright, Lynne <Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
> > But using a phrase when you could say the same thing with one word goes
> > against the principles of technical writing, no?
> >
> > "I troubleshot the problem".
> >
> > Can't see the issue with that.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > <techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> On Behalf
> > Of kafkascampi
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:57 PM
> > To: Ken Poshedly <poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net>
> > Cc: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> > Subject: Re: shoot, shot or . . .
> >
> > I would probably rewrite to avoid as well--also I am changing my name to
> > Troubleshot McGee to appear tougher in meetings.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Ken Poshedly <poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net>
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks all for the answers and sense of humor. (The rewording one is
> > > what we'll do.)
> > >
> > > Thankfully it's about 4:50 p.m. here and time to . . .
> > > a) Straighten up my deskb) Get one last phone call inc) Start on a new
> > > projectd) Go down the hall Tomorrow, guys.
> > > -- You-know-who in you-know-where
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Nina Rogers <janina -dot- rogers -at- gmail -dot- com>
> > > To:
> > > Cc: Ken Poshedly <poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net>; TECHWR-L Writing
> > > <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: shoot, shot or . . .
> > >
> > > "We explored the problem and developed a solution."
> > > Or something like that.
> > > Seriously ... "troubleshot" seems awkward, so I would just find a more
> > elegant way to word whatever I was trying to say.
> > >
> > > :D
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Wright, Lynne <
> Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > "Troubleshot" sounds less awkward/seems grammatically appropriate.
> > >
> > > Oh, and I just checked a couple of credible on-line dictionaries; they
> > all say "troubleshot" is the past tense.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: techwr-l-bounces+lynne.wright= kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > > <techwr-l-bounces+lynne. wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l.com> On
> > > Behalf Of Ken Poshedly
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:38 PM
> > > To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> > > Subject: shoot, shot or . . .
> > >
> > > OK gang. It's not even Friday, but here's something to rattle your
> cages
> > early.
> > > What's the past tense of "troubleshoot"?
> > > Normally, the past tense of "shoot" is "shot" as in "I shot the gun".
> > > But while I'm reasonably certain that "troubleshooted" is wrong,
> > "troubleshot" just doesn't seem correct either.
> > > I think I'll have another drink, bartender.
> > > -- Ken in Atlanta
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Visit
> > > TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> > > content development | http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com -dot-
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > >
> > >
> > > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/ email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> and
> > info.
> > >
> > > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> > > online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> > > public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Visit
> > > TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> > > content development | http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as janina -dot- rogers -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > >
> > >
> > > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > > http://www.techwhirl.com/ email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> > and info.
> > >
> > > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> > > online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> > > public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> > > and content development | http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kafkascampi -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > >
> > >
> > > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> > and info.
> > >
> > > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> > > online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> > >
> > > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> > > public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and
> > content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and
> > content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Natalie Cavier-Hill*
> Manager, Technical Communications
>
> [image: DEANHOUSTON+]
>
> mobile: +1 (530) 521-2335 <+1-530-521-2335>
> ncavier -at- deanhouston -dot- com
> www.deanhouston.com
>
> This electronic mail message contains information which is (a) LEGALLY
> PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM
> DISCLOSURE, and/or (b) intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) named
> herein. If you are not the Addressee(s), or person responsible for
> delivering this to the Addressee(s), you are hereby notified that reading,
> copying, or distributing this message is prohibited. If you have received
> this electronic mail message in error, please contact the mail Sender(s) by
> replying to this electronic mail message and take the steps necessary to
> delete the message from your computer.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as carolynpalo -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
shoot, shot or . . .: From: Ken Poshedly
RE: shoot, shot or . . .: From: Wright, Lynne
Re: shoot, shot or . . .: From: Nina Rogers
Re: shoot, shot or . . .: From: Ken Poshedly
Re: shoot, shot or . . .: From: kafkascampi
RE: shoot, shot or . . .: From: Wright, Lynne
Re: shoot, shot or . . .: From: Natalie Cavier

Previous by Author: The Quest for a Universal Translator for Old, Obsolete Computer Files - Atlas Obscura
Next by Author: Re: tech doc - training cooperation
Previous by Thread: Re: shoot, shot or . . .
Next by Thread: RE: shoot, shot or . . .


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads