Re: Review tools

Subject: Re: Review tools
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:32:10 -0700

PDFs on a network drive are pretty nice when they work, but most
networks I've tried it on, they didn't.

Confluence handles simultaneous edits pretty elegantly. The inline
comments work well if you can get your reviewers to use them.

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Rick Lippincott <rjl6955 -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> PDFs on a network drive, accessible by a menu system. The engineers as
> well as the technicians who are building the item add their comments, we
> check regularly (or sometimes get a notification from the commenter) and
> can usually do a quick turnaround.
> Advantage: everyone sees everyone elseâs comments.
> Disadvantage: one person leaving the PDF open can make it very difficult to
> update the file.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Review tools: From: soniaferns2004
Re: Review tools: From: Rick Lippincott

Previous by Author: Re: Review tools
Next by Author: Re: Review tools
Previous by Thread: Re: Review tools
Next by Thread: RE: Review tools

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads