Microsoft Manual of Style vs.

Subject: Microsoft Manual of Style vs.
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:46:09 -0700

"The Microsoft Writing Style Guide replaces the Microsoft Manual of
Style, a respected source of editorial guidance for the tech community
for more than 20 years."

Does it?

The late Microsoft Manual of Style was aimed at professional tech
writers and editors. The professional writers and editors who worked
on it were all laid off in July 2016.

The microsoft-style-guide GitHub project is an internal style guide
maintained by and for Microsoft's marketing and engineering
departments. The audience is made clear by comments such as, "Remember
that writing is a skill. If writing isn't a functional role your team
has, consider bringing in expert help." Hey, great editorial guidance
there, thanks.

There were no editors involved in creating it, just developers and a
marketing writer. I see no evidence that they've since hired any
editors to work on it. The formerly well-organized topics are still in
logically random sequence due to machine sorting.

As far as design, Microsoft seems to be using a generic static site
generator. Compare, which is professionally
designed and edited.

You get what you pay for.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Previous by Author: Re: [BULK] Re: Use of word "reference" when cross referencing
Next by Author: Re: Microsoft Manual of Style vs.
Previous by Thread: RE: Use of word "reference" when cross referencing
Next by Thread: Re: Microsoft Manual of Style vs.

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads